ZA
- Zoning Authority ZB
- Zoning Board ZBA
- Zoning Board of Appeals ZC
- Zero Cut ZC
- Zoning Code ZCS
- Zone Command System ZD
- Zone District ZERI
- Zero Emissions Research Initiative (UN) Zero
Population Growth (ZPG) - Absence of population growth in which equal
birth and death rates create a stable human population. (UN) Zero-lot-line
Development - A development option where side yard restrictions are
reduced and the building abuts a side lot line. Overall unit-lot
densities are therefore increased. Zero-lot- line development can result
in increased protection of natural resources, reduction in requirements
for road and sidewalk. - Smart Growth Green Development Glossary ZEV
– Zero Emission Vehicle Zircon
- A mineral [ZrSiO4] used as a refractory and as the gem, hyacinth. The
chief ore-mineral of zirconium, and a common accessory mineral in
igneous rocks. Because zircon is resistant to mechanical and chemical
weathering, it can occur as a detrital (sand grains) mineral in river
and beach sands. - BLM (DOI) Grand Escalante Staircase National Monument
DEIS Glossary ZM
- Zero Military ZM
- Zoning Management ZO
- Zoning Ordinance ZOI
- Zone of Incorporation Zone
of Aeration - The comparatively dry soil or rock located between the
ground surface and the top of the water table.
The zone of aeration is not saturated with water because its
pores are filled partly by air and partly by water. Zone
of aeration - The zone above the water table. Water in the zone of
aeration does not flow into a well. - USGS Zone
of Influence (ZOI) - The area influenced by Forest Service management
activities. Zone
of Saturation - The soil or rock located below the top of the ground
water table that is saturated with water. Zone
of saturation (Phreatic Zone) - The zone in which the functional
permeable rocks are saturated with water under hydrostatic pressure. (Meinzer,
1923, p. 21.) Water in the zone of saturation will flow into a well, and
is called ground water. – USGS 2. A subsurface zone in which all the
interstices are filled with water under pressure greater than that of
the atmosphere. - BLM Surface Mgmt. Regs. Zoning
- Process in physical planning or the results thereof, in which specific
functions or uses are assigned to certain areas (for example, industrial
zones, residential areas). (UN) One
of the municipal police powers. A
municipal ordinance that defines types and locations of land uses within
a community, addressing such elements as lot sizes and setbacks from the
street. Purpose is to
promote the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the community
and protect and preserve places and areas of historical, cultural or
architectural importance and significance.
Zoning should support the goals of a comprehensive plan.
Zoning decisions are based upon a review of the following:
appropriate use of land/compatibility with surrounding
properties, traffic circulation or congestion, adequate light and air,
overcrowding/density, adequate transportation, water, sewer, schools,
parks, and other public requirements, conserve value of property.
Municipalities adopt zoning ordinances which may in general
regulate the following: the
height, width, size, and number of stories of buildings and structures;
the percentage of a lot or tract that may be occupied; the size of yards
(setbacks), courts, and other open spaces; the location and use of
buildings, other structures, and land; and population density.
The division of a municipality (or other governmental unit) into
districts, and the regulation within those districts of 1) the height
and bulk of buildings and other structures; 2) the area of a lot that
can be built on and the size of required open spaces; 3) the net density
of dwelling units; and 4) the use of buildings and land for trade,
industry, residence, or other purposes. Zoning
- New York City adopted the first comprehensive zoning in the Country on
July 25, 1916, with the New York City Zoning Resolution. 1) Mugler v.
Kansas, (123 U.S. 623 Justice Harlan, 1887) - The U.S. Supreme Court
ruled that when a regulation respecting the use of property is designed
'to prevent serious harm,' no compensation is owing under the takings
clause. See Takings: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain by
Richard A. Epstein(1) for a discussion of the Mugler and the Euclid v.
Ambler decisions. Note particularly the contrast between the Supreme
Court's historic attitude about the police power in property (including
nuisance) and free speech cases. 2) Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal
Commission (U.S. Supreme Court 1992) - ... in Penn Central
Transportation Co. ... in the course of sustaining New York City's
landmarks preservation program against takings challenge, we rejected
the petitioner's suggestion that Mugler and the cases following it were
premised on, and thus limited by, some objective conception of
'noxiousness.' " "
'Harmful or noxious use' analysis was, in other words, simply the
progenitor of our more contemporary statements that 'land-use regulation
does not effect a taking if it substantially advances legitimate state
interests...' Nollan 484 U.S. at 834 (Quoting Agins v. Tiburon, 447 U.S.
at 260); see also Penn Central Transportation Co., 438 U.S. at 127;
Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co., 272 U.S. 365, 387388 (1926)." Judge
Scalia goes on to describe this transition and the weakness in
distinguishing between "harm-preventing" and "benefit
conferring." 3) Euclid v. Ambler (272 U.S. 365 Justice George
Sutherland 1926) - This is the oft-cited case where the
constitutionality of zoning was ruled on by the Supreme Court.
The court upheld the general principle of zoning, which
previously was the subject of varying state rulings about its
constitutionality. The takings issue was undecided, because the
ordinance was broadly challenged on Fourteenth Amendment and due process
grounds, not on the effect of any of its specific rules on a particular
party. "If these
reasons... do not demonstrate the wisdom or sound policy in all respects
of those restrictions which we have indicated as pertinent to the
inquiry, at least, the reasons are sufficiently cogent to preclude us
from saying, as it must be said before the ordinance can be declared
unconstitutional, that such provisions are clearly arbitrary and
unreasonable, having no substantial relation to the public health,
safety, or general welfare." The court noted that because a
particular injury was not complained of it would not scrutinize and
dissect provisions or matters of administration, "which, if
attacked separately, might not withstand the test of
constitutionality." 4) Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon (260 U.S.
393, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes 1922) - The Supreme Court ruled that
despite the social desirability to prevent buildings from subsiding into
mine shafts, the legislation had to provide compensation for the coal
company's interest before forbidding them from mining. Yet this ruling
is often cited to defend zoning, because the Court stated,
"Government hardly could go on if to some extent values incident to
property could not be diminished without paying for every such change in
the law." 5) Agins v. Tiburon (447 U.S. 255) - In this oft-quoted
ruling the U.S. Supreme Court held that a land-use regulation does not
effect a taking if it "substantially advance(s) legitimate state
interests" and does not "deny an owner economically viable use
of his land." In Dolan v. Tigard, the Supreme Court pointed out
that the Pennsylvania Coal and Agins rulings did not apply to an
exaction such as that under consideration.
(1) Harvard University Press, 1985, pp130ff 0,50/85-92
provisions - Refers to the so-called 50/85 and 50/92 provisions for rice
and cotton and the 0/85 and 0/92 provisions for wheat and feed grains
that were in effect in various forms from 1986 through 1995. Under these
provisions farmers could idle all or part of their permitted acreage,
putting the idled land in a conserving use, and still receive deficiency
payments for part of the acreage. A minimum planting requirement of 50
percent of maximum payment acreage had to be met in order to receive
payments in the case of rice and cotton. - USDA-Economic Research
Service Farm and Commodity Policy Glossary of Policy Terms. The 1866
Mining Law - R.S. 2477, or Section 8 of the 1866 Mining Act, provides
simply: "The right-of-way for the construction of highways over
public lands, not reserved for public uses, is hereby granted." The
Zoning Act of 1926 - The Zoning Act of 1926 allowed government control
of property. The Supreme Court ruled that such urban control was
justified under the maxim, "Use your own property in such a manner
as not to injure another." Although not the original intent, some
states zone rural land too. Zooplankton-
Small, usually microscopic animals (such as protozoans), found in lakes
and reservoirs. ZP
- Zoning Plan ZPG
- Zero Population Growth ZR
- Zoning Restriction(s) ZR
- Zoning Rewrite ZRL
- Zero Risk Level ZT
- Zero Tolerance ZTC - Zone Tax Credits
|